Why I Challenge You to Think Like Me

by Ari Herzog on Jan. 9, 2009 · 10 comments


I was a twinkle in my mother’s eye on January 20, 1961 when President John F. Kennedy orated his first inaugural address, reciting those historic words, “Ask not what your country can do for you. Ask what you can do for your country.

I’d like you to consider an idea: JFK’s words are outdated and Barack Obama would be a fool to echo them.

By means of an example, after listening to life coach Jackie Woodside talk to a local writers group several hours ago about energy management practices and aligning one’s inner chi, I perused through one of her resource books, written by Tom Wessels, that was full of highlighted passages.

My eyes stopped at two sentences in chapter 4 of The Myth of Progress:

An economy is supposed to serve its people; however, in the world today, people are to serve the economy. This may be why our leaders often refer to us as consumers rather than citizens.

Shortly after moving to Newburyport in September 2007, I entered the City Clerk’s office and filled out a voter registration form and requested a parking permit for my neighborhood’s streets. These two actions effectively prove I am a voter and a citizen.

So why, during the subsequent muncipal election season, did campaign signs sprout up around town? Why did I receive unsolicited postcards and flyers about meet-the-candidate coffee hours and fundraisers?

Last I checked, government was about something much more respectable than treating citizens like consumers.

If JFK’s words ring true today, then citizens should vote for peers and elect them into office. Why is the concept of money and material goods necessary for an election? Doesn’t that stink of NOT doing something for the country but doing something for the self?

Do you think like me? Could Wessels be right–and JFK be wrong?

A Google search introduced me to University of Maryland professor Benjamin Barber and his groundbreaking book last year, entitled, Consumed: How Markets Corrupt Children, Infantilize Adults, and Swallow Citizens Whole, which was reviewed in the Washington Post:

In a never-ending effort to make consumption the centerpiece of every American’s existence, marketers have succeeded in infantilizing adults (“kidults,” Barber calls us). We’re increasingly governed by impulse. No wonder consumer debt and personal bankruptcy have never been higher. Feeling dominates thinking, me dominates us, now dominates later, egoism dominates altruism, entitlement dominates responsibility, individualism dominates community, and private dominates public. Imagine having the ship of state guided by leaders elected by a nation of 12-year-olds. That, according to Barber, is what we’ve got.

If you think it can’t get any clearer, reviewer Barry Schwartz continued:

The Reagan revolution convinced us that turning the market loose would be good economics and good politics. Barber, in contrast, argues that “Once upon a time, capitalism was allied with virtues that also contributed at least marginally to democracy, responsibility, and citizenship. Today it is allied with vices which — although they serve consumerism — undermine democracy, responsibility, and citizenship.” In other words, in the modern era, it’s not so much democracy and capitalism as it is democracy or capitalism.

As a high school student in suburban Boston in the early 1990s, I was never offered a civics class. The closest I came was a class on U.S. history. I surely never learned civics in grade school. Did you?

That is a serious question identified by a Seattle school parent in an op-ed from 2002:

Consumers are people who have their emotional needs met by buying stuff. Once people are focused on their roles as consumers, they forget about their roles as citizens.

The purpose of public schools is to develop a respect for the intellect, rather than cultivating an unquenchable desire for products. Another important purpose of schools is to acculturate our kids to their roles as citizens.

A consumer is not a citizen. As a faculty member at the University of Washington, I love the students who arrive in the classroom with an attitude of citizenship. They’re there to help the class come together and work to learn about the topic. The students who arrive as consumers are there to be taught the topic, and they’d better darn well get their money’s worth.

With the United States preparing for its quadrennial inaugural celebration, I refer to MSNBC journalist Bob Sullivan who spoke to Ralph Nader two months ago. In the final paragraph of a report on consumerism and Wall Street, the former presidential candidate is quoted:

Perhaps (Obama) will rise to the occasion … but he does not have a challenging personality, that’s why he always talks about unity…

I challenge Obama to challenge JFK.

I challenge the country to think of me as a citizen first, a consumer to improve the economy second.

I challenge companies to mimic this challenge for the country, and think of their customers first, and their products and profit second.

I challenge you to think like me.

{ 10 comments }

Geoff Girardin January 9, 2009 at 12:36 PM

Interesting, and makes perfect sense. We aren’t consumers, we aren’t numbers, we’re people. JFK understood that. Unfortunately, everyone else seems to have missed that key point.

Geoff Girardin´s last blog post..Fresh Blow.

CGabriel January 10, 2009 at 12:30 AM

The Seattle parent says “Consumers are people who have their emotional needs met by buying stuff. Once people are focused on their roles as consumers, they forget about their roles as citizens.” Well, that’s true…in part.

As citizens, we are also consumers of political rhetoric, hyperbole and doublespeak. We buy an awful lot of it while returning precious little to the “stores.”

While we’re busy acculturating our kids into society (and I have two, so none of this is lost on me) – teaching them the “right” ways to be a citizen – many of us would do well to remember the fine print on purchases.

A consumer IS a citizen and we can do a lot for our country by remembering you don’t have to hold office to dictate policy. Similarly, you don’t have to be the price-setter to set prices. Buy what you know and know what you’re buying, literally and figuratively.

Jaculynn Peterson January 10, 2009 at 1:26 AM

And I challenge you…not to give up posting on this topic just because there are 3 comments instead of 100.

Unfortunately, the thoughts of great minds are almost always unpopular.

Glad your eyes are open, Ari. Great post!

p.s. Hoping like hell this gets picked up somewhere. I will Share It, indeed.

Jaculynn Peterson´s last blog post..It’s 2009: Got Plans?

diablogue_chat January 10, 2009 at 3:15 AM

While we’re on the subject, why don’t more folks think like this? [link to post] Is it because of the tube?

http://twitter.com/diablogue_chat/statuses/1108722030

– Posted using Chat Catcher

TerraScene January 10, 2009 at 3:42 AM

@ariherzog [link to post] got me thinking…

http://twitter.com/TerraScene/statuses/1108743700

– Posted using Chat Catcher

Ruth Seeley January 10, 2009 at 10:23 AM

In what I can only view as irony, the item I read from my Google Reader subscriptions immediately before your post was this one:

http://www.edelman.com/speak_up/blog/archives/2009/01/fashion_future.html

As I read it, I caught myself thinking how ironic it was that 80s fashions were just starting to make a comeback when recession hit. And then I read your post.

I’m not sure I understand why, exactly, you’re less than enthusiastic about Obama, since I don’t get the sense you’d have preferred a McCain/Palin win. ;) But I agree totally – no matter how cyclical business, the economy, and life are – that echoing a 1960s meme won’t work in 2009.

I’d also say that any candidate who can galvanize a country and produce the highest voter turnout in a century has a lot going for him. Your neighbours to the north had yet another federal election on October 13, 2008 – and saw the lowest turnout in Canadian voting history, something that makes me deeply ashamed of my fellow citizens.

I recently saw a young woman studying for a first-year-university Political Science 101 exam. At one point she became confused between the definitions of fascism and democracy, and I was shocked – gobsmacked. I hate to pull the ‘in my day’ routine, but I very clearly remember a Grade 10 history class in which we discussed that fascism and socialism were at opposite end of the political spectrum but that the spectrum sometimes bends so the two systems can end up behaving in remarkably similar ways. I’m wondering whether one would even get to that kind of discussion in PolySci 101 these days. (Sorry for long rambling comment.)

Ruth Seeley´s last blog post..NV09 for NeoLuddites Contest Entrant: Kirsten Chursinoff

Ari Herzog January 10, 2009 at 2:01 PM

Perhaps one of the morals as a takeaway, Chris, is many children want to buy things as if they are Veruca Salt: “Daddy, I want a golden goose!”

But does Veruca NEED a golden goose?

It reminds me of the George Carlin routine about his relationship with the Man Who Lives in the Clouds: “I don’t ask for anything I don’t want and he doesn’t give me anything I don’t need.”

Ruth, I’m very much in favor of Obama. McCain was a moron. But I don’t understand why Obama is trying to echo JFK. That’s my point.

Dave Atkins January 10, 2009 at 11:54 PM

I want to agree with you here; I know I share a lot of the same reactions to a consumptive society and I think there is actually a backlash developing as people search for what really matters in their lives. But I don’t think we get anywhere just wishing people thought or behaved differently. I think you decide what you want changed and then work on the best strategy that accepts the politic as it is. If a consumerist paradigm will get us health care reform, let’s run with it. If an appeal to civic duty is what it takes, that’s fine too. Obama will do what works, I hope, not necessarily what we think is best, to bring us all together instead of trying to win over hearts and minds with the “right” answers.

Dave Atkins´s last blog post..The Camera Eye

Christina January 12, 2009 at 1:12 AM

I caught a very small piece of Obama’s speech on the 8th, and strangely enough, he rephrased JFK’s quote that you mention above. It wasn’t as elegantly put, but the sentiment was there. Wonder what that means?

Good news! My 1st grader is indeed learning civics. Now, it’s not public school, but perhaps there is hope for the future of our youth. He is lucky to have a teacher who is very involved with those in our community who give back in a real way. I.e. she regularly volunteers at SAME Cafe (So All May Eat) and brought the class there for a field trip.

My understanding is that ever since Kennedy, televisability has been vital in deciding whether a candidate will be elected. Obama had it, McCain did not. It seems often that we are a nation focused more on looks than substance, which might be why our dear leaders think of us as 12 year olds.

Another interesting statistic (which I read somewhere but can not back up because I don’t remember where it was) is that if you take any group of, say, 600 people (barring those already in prison), and compare them to our houses of Congress, there will be far more convicted criminals amongst our representatives. So, who is drawn to life in the public eye? Not so many good guys.

One last thought: Q: How do you know if a polititian is lying?
A: His mouth is open.

Have a great day – I look forward to your interesting and thought provoking posts.

BTW – I clicked on the green link and didn’t see Twitter.

Christina (so much for one last thought)

Mark Juleen January 12, 2009 at 2:50 AM

Ari-

I struggle a bit with your challenges.

1. I like what JFK said as it stands for personal responsibility, giving, and not just taking.
2 & 3. It can’t be just one way or the other. Both sides need to be considered.
4. I’m not clear what it means to “think like you” after reading this.

It’s all about what I have to give, and not what my country gives to me.

Mark Juleen´s last blog post..I No Longer Give a #&%! About Your Closing Ratio

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post:

Next post: